misasia logo
Shwatrz and McNealy
Ellison said Java, Solaris were main reasons for acquisition By Elizabeth Montalbano
21 Apr 2009

Jonathan Schwartz, CEO, Sun Microsystems with Sun Chairman Scott McNealy (file photo)

NEW YORK, 20 APRIL 2009 - Oracle has signed a deal to purchase Sun Microsystems for US$7.4 billion, plunging the enterprise software vendor into the hardware market and making Sun the latest company to be subsumed by the Silicon Valley giant.

Oracle will pay US$9.50 per share in cash for Sun, or US$5.6 billion net of Sun's cash and debt, according to Oracle. The move follows Oracle's purchases of a raft of companies in the last few years, including Siebel, PeopleSoft and BEA Systems.

Sun shares rose by $2.41 to $9.10 in trading about a an hour after the market opened, while Oracle shares declined by $1.03 to $18.03. Shares of the buying company in big mergers and acquisitions often sink at first as investors debate the relative merits of laying out large amounts of cash for the acquisition.

The deal comes after Sun reportedly walked away from an offer from IBM a few weeks ago. Though there were rumors Oracle might purchase Sun, it has never before had a hardware or server OS business, a market in which a significant amount of Sun's assets are tied, so the deal seemed unlikely. However, Sun's Solaris long has been a successful platform for Oracle's database business.

The two companies also have areas of common interest in their support for Java software, one of the only areas where the companies' product lines overlap. Sun has an open-source Java application server called Glassfish that Oracle likely will hold onto, although the fate of Sun's other commercial Java software, the Java Enterprise System (JES), is unknown.

Oracle also had overlap in this area when it purchased BEA, but BEA WebLogic had significant installed base, and Oracle kept the product alive. Sun's installed base for JES is smaller, so Oracle may choose not to hold onto it.

Indeed, on a conference call Monday, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison said Java and Solaris were the two main reasons Oracle purchased Sun, a move that is in line with Oracle's acquisition strategy to buy companies with "market-leading products."

Calling Java "the single most important software asset we have ever acquired," he said Oracle's Java-based middleware business, bolstered first by the BEA acquisition and now by the purchase of Sun, is on track to become as large as Oracle's flagship database business. Oracle's Fusion middleware is based on Java.

Oracle also considers Solaris "by far the best Unix technology available in the market," which is why more Oracle databases run on that OS than any other, Ellison said. He said Oracle's enterprise customers running both products will be able to experience new benefits by technical integration of the products.

"We will be able to tightly integrate the Oracle database to some of the unique high-end features of Solaris, engineering them to work together and for the first time to deliver complete, integrated computer systems -- database to disk -- optimized for high performance, improved reliability, enhanced security, easier management and a lower total cost of ownership," Ellison said.

Sun Chairman Scott McNealy, who has shared a stage with Ellison on numerous occasions in the companies' more than 20-year partnership, said Sun and Oracle share many common interests that will make the union a symbiotic one for customers.

"From day one Sun has believed in openness and innovation," he said. "We both believe in the value of R&D, openness, standards, community [and] delivering a complete solution. ... Today marks the next big step in that effort."

Despite his optimism, however, the deal is undoubtedly a personal blow for McNealy, who came up alongside Ellison as a maverick of the technology industry. For years, the two led their companies as the more outspoken of Silicon Valley's executives, shooting barbs at their common enemy Microsoft and even at each other from time to time. Giving up a company he co-founded to Ellison could not have been an easy decision for McNealy.

Ellison said that Oracle tends to integrate acquired companies very quickly into the existing organization, and will do the same with Sun once the deal closes. The deal is subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.

Oracle said the Sun deal should bring the company more revenue in the first year than the company planned for its acquisitions of BEA Systems, PeopleSoft and Siebel combined. Sun should contribute $1.5 billion to Oracle's non-GAAP operating profit in the first year, a number that will increase to more than $2 billion in the second year, the company said.

For Sun, the deal will bring an end to CEO Jonathan Schwartz's efforts to turn the struggling company around. Sun's sales have been declining since their peak during the dot-com boom, as customers turned away from its pricey Unix servers in favor of x86 systems. Sun's share price has also fallen sharply.

Efforts to attract new customers with open-source software, and Sun's belated decision to enter the x86 market, have not paid off fast enough to give it the boost it needs.

With Sun on board, Oracle now will have to figure out how to navigate the server OS and hardware business. In addition to supporting Solaris for many years, Oracle also supports its software on Linux. Though Sun's hardware does not have the reach that its former suitor IBM's does, the deal gives Oracle a combined hardware/software business model more akin to IBM's, with which it now competes in the database market.

(James Niccolai in San Francisco contributed to this report.)

Comments (9)

442 says...
Let's hope the Sun doesn't come down on Oracle.
22 Apr 2009 12:57pm
Bing Bing says...
I wonder why there hasn't been much hints prior to this Oracle-acquisition. What about IBM? Anyone can shed light on this?
22 Apr 2009 1:11pm
IT Guru says...
Apparently, Microsoft is supposed to benefit from this development as another report on your site mentioned. However, Microsoft chief Steve Ballmer seems to be clueless on this deal. When asked for his thoughts on Oracle's plans to acquire Sun Microsystems, his response was simply: "I am very surprised. I have to think about it." LOL!
22 Apr 2009 1:15pm
Office Plumber says...
I guess Steve was thinking about clearing the 347th level in Gears of War
22 Apr 2009 4:30pm
Demoralised N Disillusioned says...
i am worried about the soon-to-happen job cuts at Sun.
22 Apr 2009 6:00pm
Perry Mason says...
I don't usually read stories by people other than the geniuses who write for mis-asia.com. But this one caught my eye. Deficient this story may be in many respects, not the least of which is humour, and the casual flourish of a Nobel Prize-winning writer (by the way, all these things those who write for this site have)—the subject is mighty intriguing. I must say I worry for Oracle. Seriously, buying Sun?! Hope this was a well thought out acquisition. All the others before this (incl. Hyperion, BEA etc) were OK. Just OK. The integration of their tech with Oracle's tech has been...OK, but hey, their installed bases, though small, were well-rooted and strong! However, this, blowing more than US$7 billion on some things that were once cool and possibly innovative on their own. Hey, I have a dusty ol' IBM PS2. It's a great relic from the recent past. Anyone interested? You can have it for about US$2 million. Shipping free! I hope Oracle knows what it's doing here.
22 Apr 2009 6:01pm
Arlene says...
My my my..this sure is a surprise. But I think it's a bad buy.
22 Apr 2009 7:40pm
Thomas M. says...
Bad buy? No shit! Most important of all: they should do right by getting rid of the deadwood and parasites like that fat evil witchy Xitch XXXXXXXX XXX and her Nickhead supporters out in the local advertising industry (if you can call it that with Nickhead cockroaches scrambling about).
29 Apr 2009 10:57am
Girish A. says...
This is a waste of money. The biggest winners are the Sun shareholders (someone not only put Sun out of its misery, but even rewarded these shareholders), the biggest losers are some of the Sun workers (10,000 or so, according to yet another brilliantly written story on this divine site) and maybe Oracle workers who may be made redundant as a result of this deal. Perhaps, Oracle can make something of the remnants of a former tech company that took itself too seriously, sell off its parts for some good use somewhere etc.
04 May 2009 5:54pm

Post your comment

  • Please use English to post and reply to comments
  • Please do not use offensive language in the form of racial or ethnic slurs, abuse or personal insults
  • We welcome opinion and debate geared towards finding solutions
  • Please keep comments relevant to the topic
  • All comments are moderated
** Mandatory Field

Name
    **

Email
    **

Country


Comments
Maximum characters allowed: 2000
Disclaimer: All the content posted in this category comes independently from readers of Fairfax Business Media (FBM) Asia publications, unless specified otherwise. Fairfax Business Media (FBM) is not responsible for the opinions of its readers and the content posted by them does not represent the views and opinions of FBM.

Feature

Ovum logo

Government

The race for the Indian ID database begins

The US$4 billion Unique ID (UID) project, headed by former Infosys co-chairman Nandan Nilekani, is the Indian government’s most ambitious e-governance initiative ever.
By Hansa Krishnamurthy Iyengar | 15 Mar 2010

RSS Feeds

Add this section to your favourite feed reader.