misasia logo
The cuts will affect between 5,000 and 6,000 employees. By Chris Kanaracus
17 Nov 2008

BOSTON, 14 NOVEMBER 2008 - Sun is laying off 15 per cent to 18 per cent of its employees as part of a restructuring plan aimed at saving $700 million to $800 million a year, and its top software executive is leaving the company, Sun said Friday.

The cuts will affect between 5,000 and 6,000 employees. Sun is also reorganizing its software division, a move it said stands as "a recognition of the comprehensive role software plays in the company's growth strategy."

In addition, Sun said that Rich Green, the company's executive vice president of software, has decided to leave the company. Sun said Green "has been an instrumental force in evolving Sun's Software strategy and successful business execution across its diverse portfolio."

Sun's software division changes include a new group, Application Platform Software, which includes Sun's MySQL database and infrastructure technology like the GlassFish application server.

The Cloud Computing & Developer Platforms group will focus on Web-based services as well as Sun's NetBeans development platform. Also, Sun's Solaris, virtualization and system management software teams will be moved into the company's systems group.

All changes are effective immediately, Sun said.

Sun said the economy sparked the changes.

"Today, we have taken decisive actions to align Sun's business with global economic realities and accelerate our delivery of key open source platform innovations," CEO Jonathan Schwartz said in a statement.

At the end of October, Sun blamed the downturn in the financial sector for a $1.68 billion quarterly loss. The collapse of Wall Street over the last two months eliminated several key Sun customers.

Sun has also been struggling overall for some time due to slumping sales of its high-end servers.

Angry Sun shareholders have been pressing company officials to improve its performance. Sun's share price has fallen from about $17 at the beginning of this year to roughly $4 at the start of trading Friday.

"The fact that the stock has been diving and diving and diving and is never pulling out of this dive, you start to wonder -- how long can you keep diving before you lose all your stockholders?"one shareholder said during the company's recent shareholder meeting. "How long can you be in freefall and still survive?"

Schwartz told the crowd that Sun is trying to reinvent itself by developing new server systems and attracting new customers with its open-source software portfolio. But that strategy has not borne fruit quickly.

To that end, the scale of Sun's layoffs was not out of line, said Stephen O'Grady, an analyst with Redmonk. "Yes, these are pretty deep cuts, but they're dictated by the company's performance over the past few quarters."

Regardless of Sun's finances, assets like MySQL and GlassFish are valuable assets, and "will survive in one incarnation or another," O'Grady added.

But its sales execution has not matched the quality of its portfolio, said another Redmonk analyst, James Governor, via e-mail.

Part of the problem is that Sun's success "is still overly wedded to the financial services market, a market that has literally gone off a cliff," Governor said. But the company has recently gained some major deals in the media market, he added.

"I actually thought Sun was more likely to go private than make a round of cuts, but there isn't exactly a lot of paper flying around at the moment to fund such a deal," Governor said.

Neither analyst knew exactly what prompted Green's departure, but Governor said he was "a little surprised. ... [Green] was very much Jonathan Schwartz's hire."

Sun shares stood at $4.05 in early trading, down slightly from its previous close of $4.08. But the Morgan Stanley high technology index fell about 3.7 percent.

(Additional reporting by Marc Ferranti and James Niccolai)

Comments (12)

Thomas M. says...
Mighty interesting. "Sun blamed the downturn in the financial sector for a $1.68 billion quarterly loss." How about blaming its top execs, their poor leadership (which, among other things covers cutting off good people and keeping the crap left over, and putting together products that actually really work as well with other companies' technologies. Look at that fat *# they still got in marketing.
17 Nov 2008 1:46pm
Perry Mason says...
That is a very good point. Senior execs get the lion's share of the profits when they come. When they get fired, they get their golden parachutes (i.e. they are PAID OFF handsomely). When the company does badly, they keep their jobs and may not even have to sustain a hit to their salaries...because instead of cutting salaries they prefer to cut 'heads'. That way they get to have their bonuses coming after the great job they've done in the 'rationalisation' exercise, restructuring etc. What does the regular Joe working stiff get when his company's doing well? Maybe a one-time payment of up to a maximum of four figures (e.g. $1,000, but don't hold your breath, because it is usually round three figures and in a great number of cases, two figures). And then he's asked to work harder to get more of the market since it's doing so well. And when things get rough for the company, the poor schnook will be among the first to get booted (given a day's notice), at best with a severance package that can help him tide things over with the bills for several months, which is all he's got to find employment in a desperately competitive market swamped by other job-seekers. It's either that or work harder covering for the dearly departed colleagues, to save and make the company even more money—so that they can KEEP their jobs! You tell me what is fair. And tell me why some CEOs should not be beaten to death.
17 Nov 2008 2:45pm
Karmayogi says...
Hey Perry, totally agree with you. In India, I have heard industrialists talking about CEOs and MDs taking cuts in salaries before staff is asked to take a cut. 'We are in it together' is the philosphy behind this. I think the incident in which laid off employees of a company beat their CEO to death is also acting as a reminder to the company big bosses in India. Retrenchments are unheard of in India and any large scale event can turn into a political powergame or a violent outburst. So companies are trading cautiously.
17 Nov 2008 3:14pm
Perry Mason says...
Yes, Karmayogi, yes, and so they should! But I can bet you my last dollar the vast, and I mean v-a-a-a-a-ast, majority of these scumbag CEOs in 'pro-business' states get away with doing whatever it takes to ensure their own pay packages and perks, including cutting headcount. In fact, I've heard told of one toupe-donning waxen-faced Founder and Chairman of a global publishing, events and research concern who told a bunch of people at a company conference recently that now, with the recesssion and all in full swing, is a good time to cut headcount. Now that's one Board Member to 'whack', for starters! For as long as no CEO gets 'whacked' round here, nothing will be accomplished.
17 Nov 2008 8:26pm
Grace Carter says...
People, you guys should get a grip. Sure, Sun's cutting staff, but who isn't? More than 50,000 Citigroup employees the world over will be losing their jobs. Sun doesn't seem so bad in retrospect, does it? Bloody banks!
18 Nov 2008 6:12pm
Thomas M. says...
Sure, damn the banks. Disembowel their CEOs too. But that doesn't make Sun any better. So what: you're piss, but since they're shit, you're OK. Is that it? What are you—stupid? Check out the history. Sun has continually been retrenching in time with its long drawn out death. So no, never does Sun ever seem less bad in comparison (not 'retrospect'). Eviscerate, behead and quarter—simultaneously—the CEO and heads at &*#@ and their little minions (especially that fat bitch &*#@ in the XXXXXXXX office). Because they deserve what's coming to them as much as the dregs of civilisation at AIG and all the other financial houses.
20 Jan 2009 5:53pm
Timmy Alfonso Knollwood says...
Amigos!! We should ALL do what this guy did! Man, I swear he's my idol! http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Santa-Clara-Work-Place-Shooting-Leaves-Three-Dead.html
19 Nov 2008 6:04pm
Thomas M. says...
I can't comment on what this guy Wu did in Santa Clara, really. But clearly I can see justification for beating to death that fat #@&* CXXXXXXX TXX (XXXXXXX of the #@&* office based in XXXXXXXX) and burning her house down, voodoo dolls, black cat hair, and baby bone amulets. It would be something we can do for the betterment of mankind. It is our duty as human beings.
20 Jan 2009 5:52pm
Grace Carter says...
Thomas M. I believe you have anger management issues. I suggest you seek help. It certainly sounds like you're bearing a grudge against Sun Microsystems and this XXXXXXX lady you keep insulting. Are you perhaps a disgruntled former employee?
20 Jan 2009 5:52pm
Thomas M. says...
Grace Carter, you are simple minded fool. There is no help you can find that would make you smart enough. Anger management I may need, but that doesn't change the fact that the fat @#*% CXXXXXXXX TXX is what IT is. I am not insulting IT. As with calling a spade a spade, I am calling that fat two-faced conniving witchy @#&* A FAT TWO-FACED CONNIVING WITCHY @#&*.
27 Nov 2008 3:05pm
Perry Mason says...
Thomas M., you make it sound like this "fat " ought to be impaled, then burned to death. Do I have that right?
01 Dec 2008 5:51pm
Andrew says...
Publisher's Note: This comment thread will be cleansed in accordance with Fairfax's internet and publishing policies. While we seek to encourage constructive and stimulating peer-to-peer dialogue, we will not condone unprofessional behaviour, foul language or the advocacy of violence, whether intended or not. Life may not seem fair in a capitalist world or in corporate affairs but rants and insults are not the way to go. There are many examples of individuals starting organisations which have made meaningful contributions to society. I encourage you to type in "Social Entreprenuership" into a search engine and follow your heart.
20 Jan 2009 8:13pm

Post your comment

  • Please use English to post and reply to comments
  • Please do not use offensive language in the form of racial or ethnic slurs, abuse or personal insults
  • We welcome opinion and debate geared towards finding solutions
  • Please keep comments relevant to the topic
  • All comments are moderated
** Mandatory Field

Name
    **

Email
    **

Country


Comments
Maximum characters allowed: 2000
Disclaimer: All the content posted in this category comes independently from readers of Fairfax Business Media (FBM) Asia publications, unless specified otherwise. Fairfax Business Media (FBM) is not responsible for the opinions of its readers and the content posted by them does not represent the views and opinions of FBM.

Also of Interest

John Chambers, Cisco

Networking

Chambers unfazed at disrupted speech

By Stephen Lawson
Sony Walkman

Consumer Electronics

Happy birthday! The Walkman turns 30

By Martyn Williams
Hong Kong Pavilion

Government

Hong Kong awards Shanghai Expo contract

By Ross O. Storey

Feature

Jack Loo

Jack's Musings

Fit and colour

A shabbily dressed IT person might find it hard to gain credibility when speaking to his counterparts from the business divisions.
By Jack Loo | 03 Jul 2009

RSS Feeds

Add this section to your favourite feed reader.